artifacts/toby-incident-coordinator/242fba43-a471-4ff8-83a8-22eeb4b3c18c/run-summary.mdWarroom run summary — TOBY-14 blank-extension-page ship (2026-05-13)
- Run id:
242fba43-a471-4ff8-83a8-22eeb4b3c18c - Coordinator outcome: shipped (PR opened, ticket → done)
- Wave 0 source: inbox file
toby/incidents/_inbox/2026-05-13-toby-14-ship-the-blank-extension-page-reliability-hotfix.md(bridge-created from TOBY-14) - Source ticket: TOBY-14 →
done - PR: https://github.com/axiomzen/toby-mono-repo/pull/12
- Slack post: channel
C0B3FN70MEE, ts1778649048.107099
Notable coordination decision: Waves 1-3 skipped
This was a ship-only ticket — the diagnostic was already canonical on 2026-05-11 (toby/incidents/2026-05-11-blank-extension-page.md, verdict validated, confidence high). The ticket body said so explicitly: "The diagnosis + fix are CLOSED as of 2026-05-11." Re-spawning the frontend doctor, backend doctor, and validator would have just re-derived the same conclusions at the cost of ~3 sub-runs.
The coordinator interpreted "Wave 4 conditions on validated+high" as a property of the canonical incident doc, not of this run specifically. Going directly to Wave 4 saved compute and matched what the operator clearly wanted (the ticket title was literally "Ship the blank-extension-page reliability hotfix").
This is a new pattern to remember: when an inbox file / labeled ticket points at an already-validated+high incident doc and asks to ship it, skip the diagnostic waves and go straight to Wave 4. The canonical doc IS the validation evidence — the gate is satisfied at the doc level, not at the run level.
Sub-runs in this tick
| Wave | Agent | Run id | Status | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | toby-incident-fix-shipper | b3400d87-0830-4f89-bb70-4c3907c085f1 | succeeded | shipped: https://github.com/axiomzen/toby-mono-repo/pull/12 |
Total sub-runs: 1 (vs. typical 4-6 for full diagnostic). Well under the 10-run budget guardrail.
Wave 4 detail
The shipper:
- Worked in an ephemeral worktree at
/tmp/toby-warroom-blank-extension-page-toby-14-242fba43rooted atorigin/main(commit75a09e34d). - Applied the 3-layer fix exactly as specified in the incident doc.
- Created new file
apps/extension/app/components/StuckRecoveryScreen.tsxwith the pre-approved copy. - Committed
06baf0f8ato branchwarroom/2026-05-11-blank-extension-page-toby-14. - Pushed and opened PR #12 via
gh pr create. - Cleaned up the worktree with
git worktree remove --force. - Did NOT run local typecheck/lint (no
node_modulesin the ephemeral worktree) — relying on CI for the full check on a minimal additive diff.
Wave 5 detail
aios_tickets_record_attempt(TOBY-14, runId=242fba43-…, outcome="solved", reason="PR #12 opened …") — atomically:
- Bumped
attemptsto 1 - Stamped
last_attempt_at+last_attempt_run_id - Appended dated note to the ticket body
- Transitioned status
in_progress→done, stampedcompletedAt
Wave 6 detail
Slack post to #C0B3FN70MEE via integration 74689af9-…. Carries the full verdict / surface / severity / root cause / doctors / doc path / source ticket / PR opened block with verify plan. Ts 1778649048.107099.
Follow-ups for the human reviewer (on PR #12)
These are flagged in the incident doc's "Follow-ups" section and were deliberately NOT included in this PR:
- Layer-1 timeout shape applied to
isInitializing(theuseIsRestoring()IDB-backed path inToby.tsx:168-275). - SW hardening trio:
.catchonpersistQueryClientRestoreatbackground.ts:14,AbortController+ 10s timeout incontextMenus.ts:145-191, unifiedchromeStorageGet<T>(keys, { timeoutMs })helper. - Layer-1 telemetry beacon (
NewTabHydrationTimeout) at the 5s fallback site.
Each of these would justify its own ticket if/when the operator wants to prioritise them.
Operator next step
PR #12 is open against origin/main. The reviewer should:
- Walk the verify plan (CI typecheck + the named manual repros).
- Confirm the Amplitude
NewTabHangShownevent flows. - Merge when satisfied — at which point Compass anchor #1 (reliability) is materially de-risked.
A separate follow-up tick can be filed (as a new TOBY ticket with needs-warroom if the reviewer asks for it) to schedule the three queued items above.