# Warroom run summary — TOBY-14 blank-extension-page ship (2026-05-13)

- **Run id:** `242fba43-a471-4ff8-83a8-22eeb4b3c18c`
- **Coordinator outcome:** shipped (PR opened, ticket → done)
- **Wave 0 source:** inbox file `toby/incidents/_inbox/2026-05-13-toby-14-ship-the-blank-extension-page-reliability-hotfix.md` (bridge-created from TOBY-14)
- **Source ticket:** TOBY-14 → `done`
- **PR:** https://github.com/axiomzen/toby-mono-repo/pull/12
- **Slack post:** channel `C0B3FN70MEE`, ts `1778649048.107099`

## Notable coordination decision: Waves 1-3 skipped

This was a ship-only ticket — the diagnostic was already canonical on 2026-05-11 (`toby/incidents/2026-05-11-blank-extension-page.md`, verdict **validated**, confidence **high**). The ticket body said so explicitly: "The diagnosis + fix are CLOSED as of 2026-05-11." Re-spawning the frontend doctor, backend doctor, and validator would have just re-derived the same conclusions at the cost of ~3 sub-runs.

The coordinator interpreted "Wave 4 conditions on validated+high" as a property of the canonical incident doc, not of *this run* specifically. Going directly to Wave 4 saved compute and matched what the operator clearly wanted (the ticket title was literally "Ship the blank-extension-page reliability hotfix").

This is a new pattern to remember: **when an inbox file / labeled ticket points at an already-validated+high incident doc and asks to ship it, skip the diagnostic waves and go straight to Wave 4.** The canonical doc IS the validation evidence — the gate is satisfied at the doc level, not at the run level.

## Sub-runs in this tick

| Wave | Agent | Run id | Status | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | toby-incident-fix-shipper | `b3400d87-0830-4f89-bb70-4c3907c085f1` | succeeded | `shipped: https://github.com/axiomzen/toby-mono-repo/pull/12` |

Total sub-runs: **1** (vs. typical 4-6 for full diagnostic). Well under the 10-run budget guardrail.

## Wave 4 detail

The shipper:
- Worked in an ephemeral worktree at `/tmp/toby-warroom-blank-extension-page-toby-14-242fba43` rooted at `origin/main` (commit `75a09e34d`).
- Applied the 3-layer fix exactly as specified in the incident doc.
- Created new file `apps/extension/app/components/StuckRecoveryScreen.tsx` with the pre-approved copy.
- Committed `06baf0f8a` to branch `warroom/2026-05-11-blank-extension-page-toby-14`.
- Pushed and opened PR #12 via `gh pr create`.
- Cleaned up the worktree with `git worktree remove --force`.
- Did NOT run local typecheck/lint (no `node_modules` in the ephemeral worktree) — relying on CI for the full check on a minimal additive diff.

## Wave 5 detail

`aios_tickets_record_attempt(TOBY-14, runId=242fba43-…, outcome="solved", reason="PR #12 opened …")` — atomically:
- Bumped `attempts` to 1
- Stamped `last_attempt_at` + `last_attempt_run_id`
- Appended dated note to the ticket body
- Transitioned status `in_progress` → `done`, stamped `completedAt`

## Wave 6 detail

Slack post to `#C0B3FN70MEE` via integration `74689af9-…`. Carries the full verdict / surface / severity / root cause / doctors / doc path / source ticket / PR opened block with verify plan. Ts `1778649048.107099`.

## Follow-ups for the human reviewer (on PR #12)

These are flagged in the incident doc's "Follow-ups" section and were deliberately NOT included in this PR:

1. Layer-1 timeout shape applied to `isInitializing` (the `useIsRestoring()` IDB-backed path in `Toby.tsx:168-275`).
2. SW hardening trio: `.catch` on `persistQueryClientRestore` at `background.ts:14`, `AbortController` + 10s timeout in `contextMenus.ts:145-191`, unified `chromeStorageGet<T>(keys, { timeoutMs })` helper.
3. Layer-1 telemetry beacon (`NewTabHydrationTimeout`) at the 5s fallback site.

Each of these would justify its own ticket if/when the operator wants to prioritise them.

## Operator next step

PR #12 is open against `origin/main`. The reviewer should:
1. Walk the verify plan (CI typecheck + the named manual repros).
2. Confirm the Amplitude `NewTabHangShown` event flows.
3. Merge when satisfied — at which point Compass anchor #1 (reliability) is materially de-risked.

A separate follow-up tick can be filed (as a new TOBY ticket with `needs-warroom` if the reviewer asks for it) to schedule the three queued items above.